top of page

MangoPlate

Re-envisioning "Eat, Share, Be Happy."

Role

Project

UX/UI, Mobile

Unsolicited Redesign

Timeframe

November 2018

With hopes to better the search experience for all foodies out there (myself included!), I did a self-initiated redesign of Korea’s crowd-sourcing application for discovering local and surrounding restaurants. 

"

Analyzing user tasks in every day context to create viable solutions.

During my time studying aboard in Korea, where delicious, cheap food is all the rave and my 2nd grade language proficiency is too limited for Naver blogs on trending restaurants, I've grown increasingly dependent on MangoPlate to show me the number one go-to spots for good eats.

​

Too many times, though, I've found myself struggling to find exactly what I wanted, unable to draw points between my desired results and the interface at hand. I wondered if other users had similar experiences, and if so, what were the problems?

Title.png

Content Audit

Breaking down the current interface.

As a relatively new user myself, I wanted to break down the current interface to do a heuristic evaluation and later compare the app's features to how people expected them to behave and how they felt/what they did when they didn't.

Find

This is  the home page for MangoPlate and the primary mode of searching and discovering restaurants. Components here help the user refine their search and learn more about restaurants through pictures, reviews, ratings, and other relevant business information.

picks.png
Group 8.png

Picks

Content created by MangoPlate editors on different food places based on certain foods, moods, etc. Stories are shown by the latest curated and Top list showcases the stories that are trending or most viewed.

Add

Check in to a restaurant, write a review, or add your own restaurant. Doing any of these checks chosen restaurants as Beenhere (default is set to the option to mark as Wannago).

add.png
profile.png

Feed

Reviews categorized by location. Can read reviews from the entire MangoPlate community or filter by those you follow or Holics (active members and contributors). 

Profile

Access your profile to see your own contributions and bookmarked items. Connect social media accounts like Facebook and Instagram or edit application related notifications and settings.

Task Analysis

How do users use the current system to achieve their goals? 

Use Case Survey

To guide the focus of my research, I conducted a quick survey to see how and what people mostly used MangoPlate for. Responses from 70 users showed that most users used MangoPlate to search and find restaurants and sometimes write reviews. In favor of a more in depth study and because of this reason, I decided to narrow the scope of my redesign to the Find feature.

Group 20.png
Group 21.png
Group 19.png

Task Analysis 

After going back and doing a deeper critique on Find myself, I asked 3 frequent users and 3 new users to perform a few key  tasks I thought best represented Find's function as the app's restaurant search engine. This way, I could capture new insights and see the overlap between both user demographics. It was helpful to see, even with certain expectations, how the returning users reacted when things did not turn out as they planned them to and what steps they took to resolve those issues.

​

Screen Shot 2018-11-30 at 8.52.51 AM.png

Each participant completed 8 tasks into total, following a step-by-step that ranged from basic to complex tasks. Above, you can see the task analysis results of (1) New User. I measured each task based on the success (direct success — 3, indirect success — 1, failure — 0), perceived difficulty ( 1–7, 7 being Not Difficult at All), and time required to complete the task. The Overall Score = Success + Difficulty, giving us a maximum possible score of 10.00. 

​

After, I compiled the data for all users and showed the average results. The low average is 4.33, giving me an idea of what part of the flow to focus on most when redesigning.

​

beforeweb.png
1. Reserve a dining.png

I also gathered qualitative feedback based on 5 different scenarios I gave the users to do. Here, I asked users to openly voice their thoughts as they went about completing the scenario.

​

​

Compiling Takeaways

What are the existing problems?

Pulling together insights from the heuristic evaluation and task analysis, I summarized the pain points and key behaviors found at multiple stages of the user journey. 

Inefficient Search

With Search being the primary call to action when discovering restaurants, users found a lack of constancy between what they were looking for and where they were looking for it.

Group 26.png

Limited Sort by and Filter Options

Users felt their goals were not sufficiently supported by the Sort by and Filter options available to them. Ambiguous and app-specific word choice made for a disconnected experience and users wished more business-relevant categories were available to filter by.

sortby.png

Need for Guidance

Users took a particularly longer time searching for more particular things like Reviews or restaurants through Map View due to the lack of visual and textual cues. They wanted more feedback and reassurance that what they were doing was leading them to where they wanted to go. 

map.png

Surface Relevant Information

Redundant actions clutter the UI and make users double think in fear that they will miss out on something important. Users felt lost in the process at times, feeling like they were going deeper and deeper in the application and wished for better prioritization of important call to actions. 

rest.png

Low-Fidelity Prototyping

Ideation

Before mocking anything up, I went through and did a quick brain dump, grouping problems together and fleshing out ideas that could resolve them. I began sketching what these would like in the app and how they would work with the other components that remained the same.

IMG_8346.JPG
IMG_0942.JPG

Reiterating with User Feedback

Using paper prototypes, I went back to the same users and tested out several different designs to see which ones best mirrored a guided and predictable user flow and mitigated initial issues.

IMG_9131 2.JPG
IMG_1179 2.JPG
IMG_3423 2.JPG
IMG_3275 2.JPG
IMG_4671 2.JPG

Final Designs

Combined Search and Location

In order to create a more coherent experience that mimicked restaurant searching in real life, where place and location go hand in hand, I combined Search and "You are now discovering" into one action. Suggestions for cuisine or restaurant types and areas pop up depending on whether you input food or location. 

hello.png
typing.png
locations.png

Expanding Filter by Options

Filter by now includes Sort by to eliminate toggling between the two and the option titles have been altered to be clearer. I've kept price, and in place of the cuisine types (which proved more useful in Search for initial search), have decided to add other business relevant filters that are more common in Korea: Open Now, Delivery, and Available Parking. 

CA.png
Group 2.png
filter applie.png

Guiding with More Relevant Information

Users can filter between different photo categories, whether it is of food, the menu, or the restaurant itself. More relevant information, like the price or how many people Wanna Go is shown in the restaurant specifics and I've also complemented the "Trending Nearby" with a reel on "More Places Like This."

CV.png
RV.png
SM.png

Accessible and Flexible Reviews

Create a distinction between All Reviews and Featured Reviews and guide users to access rest of the reviews. Add number rating to supplement food rating so users can speak upon whole experience. Make photo adding optional and not required.   

TM.png
HI.png
TV.png

Results

Measuring the impact of changes.

To ensure that the redesign delivered in the aspects we set to improve, I went back to the same users and asked them to redo the 8 key tasks I outlined at the beginning with the new designs (extended version in the works!).

 

Compared to the first time around, both new and returning users said the new design made for a more coherent experience and helped complete 100% of their tasks without giving up. The average overall score increased by 1.86, from 6.37 to 8.23, and we eliminated any low scores. Average time taken to complete all tasks reduced more than 50%, from 4.33 minutes to 2.12 minutes. 

afterweb.png

Reflection

How the user uses it matters.

As a MangoPlate user myself I was tempted to just generate my own interpretations and overgeneralize the problems at hand. Analyzing the tasks done in context guided me back to the users' perspective, depicting what actions they took to achieve what they needed and showcasing what their actual needs were in the end. 

​

Going back I would look at the lowest precent increases for scores, particularly for Writing Reviews and Reading Reviews. Because MangoPlate thrives as a crowd-sourced application, it would be imperative to the business to project these items better to users either by surfacing them earlier on, or making the call to actions more apparent.

Connecting students to community and opportunity

bottom of page